Research Paper on The impact of automated feedback on text production that is fluency-focused

Description

Title: The impact of automated feedback on text production that is fluency-focused

Abstract: This article focuses on empirical research that evaluated the effects of a novel intervention for promoting first-language writing fluency and offers a new intervention for improving first-language authors’ writing fluency in both the process and product measures of writing. The research was carried out by the University of South Australia and the University of Western Australia. Both the University of South Australia and the University of Western Australia contributed to the study project in some capacity. In addition, the paper offers a description of empirical research that explored the effects of a unique intervention meant to increase the writing fluency of authors who speak English as their first language. Researchers from the University of California, Irvine, were the ones who were responsible for carrying out the research for the study. The intervention helps the writer become more prolific by delivering automated feedback in real-time, which in turn stimulates fluent text output in public and supports the writer in being more prolific. The writer will get this information as input.The option to take into consideration this feedback is provided to the writer. A well-regarded university situated in the geographical middle of the United States had twenty first-year students enrolled at the institution. When they came to the school, each of these pupils was a native English speaker, all of whom were born in the United States and spoke English as their first language. The writing competition included twenty participants, and every one of them was an extraordinarily talented writer in their own right. Using a web-based text editor that included tools for keystroke monitoring, every participant generated two pieces of writing that were entirely original for them. One of the pieces of writing was generated as a consequence of the participant being exposed to the “control” condition, while the other piece of writing was produced as a result of the participant being exposed to the “intervention” condition. In every other regard, these sets of circumstances were the same.The participants were given a questionnaire with open-ended questions, and their replies to those questions made up the qualitative data that was analyzed. The quantitative data, on the other hand, comprised product and process metrics extracted from the texts written by participants in both the control and the intervention conditions. These participants were exposed to either the control condition or the intervention condition. These subjects were either in the control or intervention conditions throughout the study. The participants in the research study were each given a random assignment that indicated whether they would participate in the control or intervention conditions. This assignment defined which condition they would take part in. It explored the shifts due to the varied conditions resulting from the quantitative data being analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression models. These models were applied to the data in order to make it possible. According to the findings, there were significant differences in the writing process itself between the product of writing that was generated during the intervention and the writing that was produced during the control condition. These differences were found in both the writing that was produced during the intervention as well as the writing that was produced during the control condition. However, the two situations were precisely the same in every other regard. The writing generated during the intervention and produced during the control condition shared this expected quality. This was likewise the case for the writing generated while the participants were exposed to the control condition. As a direct consequence of the intervention, the overall quality of the writing was greatly enhanced, particularly when contrasted with the condition that served as the control for the experiment. Specifically, compared to participants who had access to the control condition, those who had access to the fluency-focused intervention condition published texts of higher quality, wrote more text, and communicated more concepts. This was the case while considering the individuals given access to the control condition. In addition, we consider the qualitative outcomes, which may be inferred from the responses supplied in the questionnaire.Writing Fluency, therapies for writing Fluency, and product and process assessments of writing are some terms that should be utilized in this field of study.

Keywords: 

Download Paper and turnitin Plagiarism Report in 10 Seconds only

Paper Quality: SCOPUS / Web of Science Level Research Paper

Subject: ELT – English Language Teaching

Writer Experience: 20+ Years

Plagiarism Report: Turnitin Plagiarism Report will be less than 10%

Restriction: Only one author may purchase a single paper. The paper will then indicate that it is out of stock.

What will I get after the purchase?

A turnitin plagiarism report of less than 10% in a pdf file and a full research paper in a word document. You will get it within 10 seconds.

In case you have any questions related to this research paper, please feel free to call/ WhatsApp on +919726999915