Description
Title: a justification for including writing in secondary subject-matter classes: Educators’ perspectives on the advantages of frequently integrating writing
Abstract: Even though teachers are constantly held accountable for demands that center on writing in all subject areas, very little is known about their experiences with or motivations for introducing writing into classrooms in subject areas; this is even though teachers are constantly held accountable for demands that focus on writing in all subject areas. Although very little is known about teachers’ experiences with or the motives for incorporating writing into classrooms in subject areas, this is the case. This study examines the decision-making processes of teachers in order to learn more about why they include writing in their classroom instruction across various subject areas. The research was carried out to learn more about why teachers include writing in their classroom instruction. This study does not concentrate on explaining writing instruction in secondary schools in the United States or analyzing the difficulties associated with integrating writing instruction. Instead, the focus is on why educators introduce writing into their classrooms. As part of our investigation into the factors that led instructors to choose whether or not to incorporate writing into their instruction routinely, we analyzed the responses that teachers provided using a multicast research methodology. This was done as part of our research on the factors that led instructors to decide. During one academic quarter, a request was made to four separate teachers, one from each of the four core subject areas, to report on how they included writing in their lectures. The instructors were asked to provide examples of how they encouraged students to write (mathematics, English language arts, science, and social studies). According to the findings, teachers who recognize the great potential benefits that frequent writing may have for their students and who incorporate writing into their lesson plans are far more likely to encourage their students to write constantly. The instructors saw that the students who wrote often developed unique work and had a greater knowledge of the subjects that they were studying. Because of these advantages to the teachers’ pedagogy, they had the impression that they had a better knowledge of the learning processes of their students, and as a result, they prepared their lectures with greater attentiveness. As a result of this, the teachers were more effective communicators. According to the findings of this study, committing to the frequent Integration of writing into the curriculum can have two beneficial effects: first, it can improve students’ writing and subject-matter knowledge; second, it can broaden teachers’ knowledge of how to encourage students’ writing practices and use writing as a tool for learning in the various subject areas. Both of these effects can result from committing to the frequent Integration of writing into the curriculum. These two impacts are both in a good direction. Our findings shed light not only on the deep relationship between educators’ beliefs and the activities they take when teaching but also on how that link came to exist in the first place. By analyzing the instructional decisions made by teachers who frequently include writing in their lessons, we provide advice on how pre-service and in-service teachers could use reflection in and on action to create a commitment to teaching writing. This advice is based on our analysis of the instructional choices made by teachers who include writing in their lessons. The decisions that instructors who regularly include writing into their lessons were analyzed in this study, which was carried out by looking at the data they provide. This may be accomplished by investigating the pedagogical choices made by teachers who routinely use writing in their classes.
Keywords: Writing in all subject areas, literacy in all academic fields, writing instruction, secondary education, and instructional decision-making are some of them that have been considered for this article.
Download Paper and turnitin Plagiarism Report in 10 Seconds only
Paper Quality: SCOPUS / Web of Science Level Research Paper
Subject: ELT – English Language Teaching
Writer Experience: 20+ Years
Plagiarism Report: Turnitin Plagiarism Report will be less than 10%
Restriction: Only one author may purchase a single paper. The paper will then indicate that it is out of stock.
What will I get after the purchase?
A turnitin plagiarism report of less than 10% in a pdf file and a full research paper in a word document. You will get it within 10 seconds.
In case you have any questions related to this research paper, please feel free to call/ WhatsApp on +919726999915
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.