Description
Title: METHODS FOR TESTING DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY
Quality: SCOPUS & Web of Science Level
Instant Download on payment
Please read additional information for further details.
Abstract:
According to the research findings, in addition to the three methods that have already been mentioned, two other avenues can be pursued to evaluate the discriminant validity of multiple-choice examinations. Both of these avenues are possible ways to evaluate the discriminant validity of multiple-choice examinations. It is strongly encouraged that the chi-square difference test and the average variance extraction analysis be utilized throughout the phases of research that confirm whether or not anything is real. These tests are utilized to determine whether or not something is true. The results of each of these tests are presented in Table 1. Because Q-sorting is a more experimental method, it is recommended to be used in the earlier stages of the research process. This is because Q-sorting is a more complicated method than other sorting methods. This article presents the findings of two surveys that were conducted to construct a scale for evaluating the degree of risk that is perceived to be associated with making purchases online. The surveys were conducted to determine how people feel about the risks associated with online purchases. The findings of both polls will be presented in the next sections of this article. In addition to that, the book provides a concise and straightforward overview of each of the three research methods.
Keywords: Q-sorting, confirmatory factorial analysis, discriminant validity, validity
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.